Queen music download : Boston 76 - audio DVD (96kHz stereo, correct speed)
> Back to index...
If you are using this torrent, but don't see your username (and would like to) you just need to download the torrent again. The new torrent will update the server with your username.
Discuss this download in the forums | Download torrent
| Username / IP Address | Uploaded | Downloaded | Last connected | Remaining |
What do you think?
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, as I’ve said in my previous post, for me 16 bits version sounds better than most of other recordings, I’m talking about the quality of the recording exclusively, not about the closeness to the stage or volume level, although the latter are other very important factors
This sounds exactly the same as the FLAC files that were shared on Dime, with the only difference being I slowed it down to play at the right speed.�
Although at the beginning I though that this one was authored as DVD- audio, I was wrong, so then in this case I think we haven’t take the most of the audio content…but anyway it’s strange, it should sound different in any case; can you tell me what is installed in your PC for to hear the 24 Bits version?
In other words, we couldn't scale up the 16/44 recording to sound like this. It would still sound the same, and it would just be bigger files. The 16/44 share was dithered down from the original 24/96 files, and that quality loss cannot be brought back.
Yes, that's true
Can someone tell me what the difference between audio DVD and DVD-A is? Is it that DVD-A has to be 5.1 ?
Well, there's a huge difference:
DVD-Audio is a dedicated high resolution audio format, which works with 24 bits resolution and up to 192 Khz sample-rate frequency, it can be stereo or multi-channel output, it's a lossless format.
An audio DVD is a disc authored as DVD video and contains menus of audio files, DVD video is usually a lossy format (talking about audio only) like DTS (3:1 compression) or Dolby Digital (12:1 compression)
Best Regards! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody at this forum ever said the opposite, the files shared here are lossless, but if your dvd player don’t meet 24 Bits/96 Khz DAC’s, it will compress the files
And any DVD-V with PCM it's lossless
That’s true, but most DVD-V discs don’t use PCM as audio files
The advange of DVD-A is you could havelmultichannel lossless...DVD-V cannot reach that, nor go beyond 96...
Nope, as well
DVD-A specification support 192 khz as maximum sample rate frequency
Besides, without doubt, multipurpose (in this case video plus audio formats) equipment has built-in mediocre DAC’s with more distortion and more signal-to-noise ratio, etc. than dedicated AUDIO equipments, so in the latter a DVD-A recording will sound much better |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
