Queen
add to QueenzonePrivate MessagesYour settingsYour Profile

Queen music download : Providence 1974.04.27 on Dime

> Back to index...

If you are using this torrent, but don't see your username (and would like to) you just need to download the torrent again. The new torrent will update the server with your username.

Discuss this download in the forums | Download torrent

Username / IP AddressUploadedDownloadedLast connectedRemaining
ruth.olivier 25008 1 MB 022 May 12, 07:04 Complete
ruth.olivier 25008 9 MB 022 May 12, 07:02 Complete
ruth.olivier 25008 0 022 May 12, 07:02 Complete
gkeen 0 022 May 12, 07:20 322 MB
gkeen 0 44 MB22 May 12, 06:53 278 MB

What do you think?

Post Reply

 
The second-earliest known Queen recording from the US is now out there..

http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=344729

Hopefully someone can bring it here.. ?
Posted by The Real Wizarduser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 1:38:00 PM
Amazing share on Dime !!!
I'll try to post here in Queenzone, right now !
Posted by GuitarMayuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 1:51:00 PM
Excellent!

I waited for that one for a long time and now it's up. Thanks!
Posted by Lostmanuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 1:52:00 PM
Here it is. Enjoy !
Posted by Stephane15user not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 1:52:00 PM
Well... you're so fast Stephane15, hein ?   ... he he
 what matters is what is already available for everyone here in Queenzone !!!  :)
Posted by GuitarMayuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 2:11:00 PM
Thanks a LOT Stephane15!
Is possible to share here too the mott the hoople recording from the same gig ?
http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=344675
Posted by bruno_faciouser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 2:12:00 PM
I'm listening to it now!

very enjoyable to me, even though there's distortion. I don't mind:-)
Posted by on my way upuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 2:16:00 PM
Thanks Stephane !  Could someone also share the 96/24 version ?
Posted by The Real Wizarduser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 2:19:00 PM
Thank you Bob and Stephanie!

Oh, and thanks to Dan Lampinski!
Posted by Gregsynthuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 2:40:00 PM
Thanks!
Posted by last-horizon 42265user not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 2:58:00 PM
Wow! Thank you very much for sharing this interesting recording! : )
Posted by Tim Juneuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 3:13:00 PM
Here's the Mott 16-44.  The Queen24-96 is about half finished as I write this.  I'll seed it here if no one else beats me to it :)

Here are the setlist and lineage. Other notes are in the info file.

CD1
01 intro
02 American Pie
03 The Golden Age Of Rock 'N' Roll
04 Sucker (spliced)
05 Roll Away The Stone/sweet Jane
06 Rest in Peace
07 All the Way From Memphis
08 Born Late '58
09 One Of The Boys
10 Hymn for the Dudes (spliced)
11 Marionette
12 Drivin' Sister >
13 Crash Street Kids >
14 Violence

CD2
01 E: All the Young Dudes
02 Walkin` With A Mountain (spliced)

unknown model dictation style Tape Recorder
External Mono Microphone
Scotch cassettes

Mastered and FLAC'ed by Carl Morstadt (dantalion8@yahoo.com)

Master Cassette ->
Nakamichi CR-3A cassette deck with azimuth correction ->
M-Audio Firewire Audiophile 2496 ->
CDWAV 24-bit/96-KHz wav files ->
Goldwave (normalizing and crossfades) ->
CDWAV (track breaks) ->
dBpowerAMP Audio Converter (24-bit/96-KHz wav files converted to
16-bit/44.1 KHz wav files) ->
FLAC Front End (FLAC 8 with sector boundary alignment)
FLAC files tagged with Foobar2000 Live Show Tagger

No EQ'ing.
Posted by Ginger01user not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 3:19:00 PM
Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i can't wait to hear this!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lampinsky is very important to the Music Sharing!! I wish I could thank him personally. Living in Massachusetts and hearing all these recordings from him (especially a Gary Wright show my late brother attended in the 70's) means alot to me.
Posted by tjleoneuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 3:36:00 PM
Here's the Mott 24/96... Queen won't be long now :))
Posted by Ginger01user not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 3:48:00 PM
And now....  the Queen 24-96!!

Good download, everybody :))
Posted by Ginger01user not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 4:02:00 PM
If anyone could upload this in Mediafire it would be great!

Cheers!
Posted by MERQRYuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 6:01:00 PM
Thank You So much to everyone for these!!!!
Posted by A Word In Your Earuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 6:20:00 PM
WOWWW! thank you very much for this!!! Could someone explain to me this 16-44 24-96 thing???
Posted by fbrjqueenuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 7:06:00 PM
Bloody hell.
They said the final lampinski was going to blow people away, and this certainly is!

Thanks for uploading both versions here :)
Posted by brians wiguser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 7:12:00 PM
fbrjqueen wrote: WOWWW! thank you very much for this!!! Could someone explain to me this 16-44 24-96 thing???
-----------------------------------------------------------------
That means 16 bits 44.100 Hz and 24 bits 96.000 Hz.
The bits indicate the audio Depth and the Hz the sample frecuency.
The conmmon cds have 16 bits and 44.100 hz

Cheers!
Posted by MERQRYuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 10:34:00 PM
H there,

I'm unable to use torrents. Is there anyone out there who has the time to make this file available on megaupload? If so, thank you very much.
Posted by CruellaDeVilleuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/13/2011 11:27:00 PM
Damn, what a cool solo by Brian in Liar... he uses his delay, but never, ever in this song... a one time thing.  Very unique.
Posted by The Real Wizarduser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 12:31:00 AM
Here's a direct download of the 16/44 version, for those who can't torrent -

http://www.multiupload.com/DWNNCL26WY
Posted by The Real Wizarduser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 1:44:00 AM
Strange, I looked yesterday afternoon on Dime and there was nothing yet :-)Looking forward to downloading this one, what's the sound quality on this one ?
Posted by pittrekuser is on Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 1:58:00 AM
Sir GH wrote: Here's a direct download of the 16/44 version, for those who can't torrent -

http://www.multiupload.com/DWNNCL26WY

--------------------------------
A MillonThanks bob!

Cheers!
Posted by MERQRYuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 2:43:00 AM
pittrek wrote:

what's the sound quality on this one ?

===============================

Not great.  But still worth a listen.
Posted by The Real Wizarduser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 2:44:00 AM
Thanks very much to everybody!! I'm looking forward to hear it!
Posted by Lazing On A Sunday Afternoonuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 3:01:00 AM
Dear Bob/Sir GH,

Thank you very much! I look forward to hearing his soon. Have a nice day!
Posted by CruellaDeVilleuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 5:35:00 AM
MERCI BEAUCOUP
Posted by vivaqueenuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 5:52:00 AM
Thanks a lot for uploading this. Always great to add another show to the collection :))

Tim
Posted by therhyemanuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 6:33:00 AM
Thank you :)
Posted by Magda1983user not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 8:04:00 AM
OK I'm just listening to it. Can somebody fix the speed ? :-)
Posted by pittrekuser is on Queenzone.com
on 2/14/2011 11:04:00 AM
fbrjqueen wrote: WOWWW! thank you very much for this!!! Could someone explain to me this 16-44 24-96 thing???

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quick, hopefully simple, analogy:  when you watch a film, you're actually looking at between 25 and 30 still photographs whizzing by every second.  This fools the human eye into seeing fluid movement. �

When you listen to digital audio (i.e. a CD), you're actually hearing 44,100 'photographs', or snapshots, of audio per second.  Likewise this fools the ear into hearing continuous sound.  Current technology can increase this to about 192,000 snapshots per second, but 44,100 is the CD audio standard. �

The 16-bit part means that each of those 44,100 snapshots is stored as a 16 digit-long binary 'word' (piece of information). Again, this resolution can currently be increased to 32-bit words (maybe even 64?), but 16 is the CD audio standard.

You can see from this that the more snapshots we use per second, coupled with longer words (think of increased decimal places or accuracy of the snapshot), the greater the resolution of the captured audio will be.

Hope that helps.

And many thanks indeed to everyone involved in getting this recording to us!
Posted by starkuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 6:02:00 AM
This is fantastic! A new US 1974 recording, really exciting!
Many thanks to everyone who is involved for making the share!
Posted by Harry_queenbootlegsuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 6:28:00 AM
It's running too slow!

Why don't people check these things before uploading?
Posted by FriedChickenuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 6:28:00 AM
FriedChicken wrote: It's running too slow!

Why don't people check these things before uploading?

-------------------
A speed corrected version is also here
Posted by pittrekuser is on Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 6:55:00 AM
stark wrote:

Quick, hopefully simple, analogy:  when you watch a film, you're actually looking at between 25 and 30 still photographs whizzing by every second.  This fools the human eye into seeing fluid movement.  

When you listen to digital audio (i.e. a CD), you're actually hearing 44,100 'photographs', or snapshots, of audio per second.  Likewise this fools the ear into hearing continuous sound.  Current technology can increase this to about 192,000 snapshots per second, but 44,100 is the CD audio standard.  

The 16-bit part means that each of those 44,100 snapshots is stored as a 16 digit-long binary 'word' (piece of information). Again, this resolution can currently be increased to 32-bit words (maybe even 64?), but 16 is the CD audio standard.

You can see from this that the more snapshots we use per second, coupled with longer words (think of increased decimal places or accuracy of the snapshot), the greater the resolution of the captured audio will be.

----------------------------------------------

Perfect analogy, Stark.  Whenever people say that they can't hear the difference between 16/44 and 24/96, I just think, "I guess not all ears were created equal."
Posted by The Real Wizarduser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 10:11:00 AM
pittrek wrote: FriedChicken wrote: It's running too slow!

Why don't people check these things before uploading?

-------------------
A speed corrected version is also here

Thanks!

But still.... why would someone not check before uploading...
Posted by FriedChickenuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 12:20:00 PM
Not everyone has the musician's ear and can hear such things... it's as simple as that.
Posted by The Real Wizarduser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 12:24:00 PM
Wow - thanks Ginger, you're my favourite! ;-)
Posted by TimBHMuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 3:25:00 PM
Thank You !!!
Posted by DGAAuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/15/2011 3:27:00 PM
It's nice to have a new recording, thanks to the sharer(!), but the quality is terrible. I can't listen to this. Then again, one shouldn't expect too much from such an old recording.
Posted by Rickuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/16/2011 3:33:00 AM
Rick wrote:

Then again, one shouldn't expect too much from such an old recording.

==========

Well, you should... !  It all depends on what gear they used, where in the venue they were standing, how good the sound mix was that night, etc.

The recording from next night in Portland sounds leagues better than this.  And there are audience recordings from the late 60s that sound even better than that.
Posted by The Real Wizarduser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/16/2011 1:41:00 PM
Sir GH wrote: Rick wrote:

Then again, one shouldn't expect too much from such an old recording.

==========

Well, you should... !  It all depends on what gear they used, where in the venue they were standing, how good the sound mix was that night, etc.

The recording from next night in Portland sounds leagues better than this.  And there are audience recordings from the late 60s that sound even better than that.

    ==========

Exceptions taken into account of course. But generally, I think you should not expect too much.
Posted by Rickuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 2/17/2011 4:26:00 AM
New download-links for this share:
http://www.embedupload.com/?d=9TGGAHFNDH
Posted by bokkepootuser not visiting Queenzone.com
on 1/28/2012 7:24:00 AM