| Author |
|
theCro
Royalty: 1056 posts
|
tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes?
|
pittrek
Deity: 10105 posts
|
Ehm - because it does NOT exist ?
|
Smitty
Cool, we have display messages
Deity: 6196 posts
|
The gig definitely existed...in 1986. Come on, can we let this one go? The most we will get is audio from the concert, most likely as a crappy "top 100 bootlegs" release. The reason we won't get video has already been touched on in this thread.
|
onevsion
Deity: 2241 posts
|
<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: The gig definitely existed...in 1986. Come on, can we let this one go? The most we will get is audio from the concert, most likely as a crappy "top 100 bootlegs" release. The reason we won't get video has already been touched on in this thread. I agree. Also, I'm quite happy with the bootleg video filmed from the screen with the EX audience recording copy from the masters synched to it. No need for an official release IMHO. A 70's release is what most fans want I think. Hammy '79 would be great.
|
john bodega
Deity: 12725 posts
|
theCro wrote: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist? Haha haha hahahahahha. Hahahaha.
|
theCro
Royalty: 1056 posts
|
Zebonka12 wrote: theCro wrote: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist? Haha haha hahahahahha. Hahahaha. what's so funny? go and suck your daddy's nipples rofl
|
Penetration_Guru
Deity: 11027 posts
|
Hypothetically, if the entire multi-angle footage hadn't disappeared off SOMEONE's hard drive, we COULD have had it released....
|
john bodega
Deity: 12725 posts
|
theCro wrote: Zebonka12 wrote: theCro wrote: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist? Haha haha hahahahahha. Hahahaha. what's so funny? go and suck your daddy's nipples rofl What's so funny? BRIAN MAY: It wasn't recorded GREG BROOKS: It wasn't recorded THE CRO: So why hasn't it been released?
|
Benn
Royalty: 1332 posts
|
Why? Because TheCro is a buffoon and continually bombards this board with ridiculously inane questions. Just waiting for his next one: "Why is Brian sometimes called Brian May and sometimes just Brian?"
Benn
|
pittrek
Deity: 10105 posts
|
|
Aquillas
Omul invizibil
Bohemian: 613 posts
|
The fourth link is the best. :P
|
|
theCro
Royalty: 1056 posts
|
Aquillas wrote: The fourth link is the best. :P responses on that thread just show how some of Queen fans(if we can call them like that) are stupid, childish and immature when i ask question i ask it because i dont know the answer and i'm not acting like some fucking idiots there...
|
Winter Land Man
Jake
Deity: 4400 posts
|
theCro wrote: Aquillas wrote: The fourth link is the best. :P responses on that thread just show how some of Queen fans(if we can call them like that) are stupid, childish and immature when i ask question i ask it because i dont know the answer and i'm not acting like some fucking idiots there... I wasn't joking on that thread.
"Please buy my upcoming album... I need the money"
|
theCro
Royalty: 1056 posts
|
.*.Messenger: Jake Pyndle.*. wrote: theCro wrote: Aquillas wrote: The fourth link is the best. :P responses on that thread just show how some of Queen fans(if we can call them like that) are stupid, childish and immature when i ask question i ask it because i dont know the answer and i'm not acting like some fucking idiots there... I wasn't joking on that thread. ok sorry then, it wasnt meant to you
|
Roger's Beard
Bohemian: 315 posts
|
"Hypothetically - why Queen will not release 'Live at Knebworth' Hmmm.If you mean "video" then maybe because they just don't have it? Despite what Greg says, it's unlikely that the feed from the big screen was NOT recorded. However, it is very probable that the feed would have been recorded either straight to VHS (which will be languishing forgotton in Brian's loft) or on either lo-band or hi-band U matic videocassette: either way, these formats will NOT be of sufficient quality to ever merit a practical commercial release. It IS more likely that we will get a CD release of the concert at some point, or even a 5.1 surround mix on an "extras" disc. Budapest on disc one, Knebworth DVDA surround mix on disc two with what little broadcast quality footage survives.
|
Raf
Stop this noise!
Deity: 8274 posts
|
Benn wrote: Why? Because TheCro is a buffoon and continually bombards this board with ridiculously inane questions. Just waiting for his next one: "Why is Brian sometimes called Brian May and sometimes just Brian?" Not to mention when he decides to upload some mp3 files and insists on writing a disclaimer like "I don't have it in FLAC and fuck off if you like FLAC"
We got the Cosmos rockin'!
We got the Cosmos rockin'!
We got the Universe rockin'!
We got the Cosmos rockin'!
We got the Cosmos rockin' to the mighty power of rock'n'roll!
|
Penetration_Guru
Deity: 11027 posts
|
theCro wrote: Aquillas wrote: The fourth link is the best. :P responses on that thread just show how some of Queen fans(if we can call them like that) are stupid, childish and immature when i ask question i ask it because i dont know the answer and i'm not acting like some fucking idiots there... We should have a race to find theCro's "I lost all my best mp3s, please resupply" thread, to prove what a wally he is.... mate, you ARE a fucking idiot, however much to would like to believe the contrary.
|
brENsKi
How shall we f**k off, Oh Lord
Deity: 8088 posts
|
theCro uttered verbal diarrhoea: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ because you are talking shit?
go deo na hÉireann
|
thunderbolt 31742
Bohemian: 647 posts
|
theCro wrote: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes? Because Roger had a particularly bad acid trip the night after the concert and ate the tapes. There, happy?
"Do you think I should keep this mustache? Did you say no? F--- off."
|
theCro
Royalty: 1056 posts
|
<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: theCro uttered verbal diarrhoea: tell me your reasons - why Queen productions is not releasing gig which has been recorded with cameras if it hypothetically exist on master tapes? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ because you are talking shit? oh poor retard you go and suck your daddy's nipples ROFL get a life, jerk
|
