Forums > Sharing The Music - Announce > ANNOUNCE: Queen in London, UK (Dec.09-1980)

---

I don't believe what I see!!! It's all a dream, right? ;-) All three Wembley gigs completed (8,9 and 10 XII 1980)

THANX x 1000 :)

---

Thank you for sharing another one!
The 1980's shows are very good.

---

FAntastic, another I didn't have. Thanks a lot man!

---

You must be kidding. You want to kill me, right?

Say it. "I wanna kill yara", just say it.

Now...I'm still seeding the other one, I just came from my class, and I don't know whether there's space avaiable for me to download this one...I will create space. lol I will ask for help from friends here to delete what's useless and stuff.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU.

You made my day - and I didn't even have the time to enjoy all the flags in the torrent client, you can't believe it, there was one from Sweden, I'm not making it up, it was absolutely beautiful and fantastic, very well designed, so cute, I wanted to hold that flag so dearly...and the flag from Italy, which is rare, I had only seen in the client once, I LOVE this flag, and there was a flag from France for the first time in my whole torrent life.

I'm kinda of moved, really.

So I'll stop.

---

Thank you for this, I was really looking for it!

It's amazing to hear Imagine, but I would they have never played this (=John Lennon wouldn't be dead).

---

mp3 sourced

---

Thank you very much.Now I have the all three concert of this '80.Dec. Wembley series.

---

Spectral views are best to identify fake loseless.

This seems like an mp3 played thru Winamp or WMP and recorded onto WAV, so definately LOSSY.

I wonder why all last Roy's shares are mp3 sourced passed as loseless. Would you mind checking your shares before uploading them?

Thanks in advance.

---

Hi dear Alex. How are you ?

So you mean a Mpeg file passed as lossless shows that strange line ? Is that always the case, and does that absolutely mean that it is mpeg disguised with Winamp or so ? I am not that expert in that field and I am always happy to learn new things. I had one recording showing the same thing, a strange line, but closer to 20.000 :

Paul Rodgers solo (yes I know, you LOVE Paul Rodgers !), thanks Dobo : http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=1065375

In this post I uploaded some spectral views and frequencies analysis of the tracks, they show the same strange thinh. These files come from radio broadcast, don't know if that explain something anyway.

Also could you please get an eye on the Milwaukee 1976, I did the same thing, I uploaded spectral views and frequencies analysis for this gig and still wanted to have some explanation about the way they look. It's in this topic (thanks Queenline, I read your PM !) :
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q_FORUM_ID=4&Q_FORUM_NAME=Sharing+The+Music+-+Announce&TOPIC_SUBJECT=ANNAONCE%3a+1976-03-01+Milwaukee+in+Rapidshare&Q=1105421&page=2


If you can help us with your skills, many thanks in advance !!

Regards,

Olivier,
France.

---

To help Daffy, these were the results I got for the first four files of this share:

"auCDtect: CD records authenticity detector, version 0.8.2
Copyright (c) 2004 Oleg Berngardt. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2004 Alexander Djourik. All rights reserved.

Detect mode (0..40 with 0 = most accurate): 8 (default)


------------------------------------------------------------
[Track 01.wav]
Detected average hi-boundary frequency: 2.103089e+004 Hz
Detected average lo-boundary frequency: 1.428293e+004 Hz
Detected average hi-cut frequency: 2.131595e+004 Hz
Detected average lo-cut frequency: 2.049020e+004 Hz
Maximum probablis boundary frequency: 2.049700e+004 Hz
Coefficient of nonlinearity of a phase: 8.244348e-002
First order smothness: 5.558912e-001
Second order smothness: 8.912387e-001
------------------------------------------------------------
Could not qualify the source of this track.

------------------------------------------------------------
[Track 02.wav]
Detected average hi-boundary frequency: 2.084761e+004 Hz
Detected average lo-boundary frequency: 1.699927e+004 Hz
Detected average hi-cut frequency: 2.115631e+004 Hz
Detected average lo-cut frequency: 2.039919e+004 Hz
Maximum probablis boundary frequency: 2.050800e+004 Hz
Coefficient of nonlinearity of a phase: 1.231808e-001
First order smothness: 4.882629e-001
Second order smothness: 8.028169e-001
------------------------------------------------------------
Could not qualify the source of this track.

------------------------------------------------------------
[Track 03.wav]
Detected average hi-boundary frequency: 2.089824e+004 Hz
Detected average lo-boundary frequency: 1.534780e+004 Hz
Detected average hi-cut frequency: 2.116819e+004 Hz
Detected average lo-cut frequency: 2.030373e+004 Hz
Maximum probablis boundary frequency: 2.051300e+004 Hz
Coefficient of nonlinearity of a phase: 1.009380e-001
First order smothness: 5.220126e-001
Second order smothness: 8.207547e-001
------------------------------------------------------------
This track looks like CDDA with probability 43%.

------------------------------------------------------------
[Track 04.wav]
Detected average hi-boundary frequency: 2.081400e+004 Hz
Detected average lo-boundary frequency: 1.532186e+004 Hz
Detected average hi-cut frequency: 2.114171e+004 Hz
Detected average lo-cut frequency: 2.024537e+004 Hz
Maximum probablis boundary frequency: 2.048100e+004 Hz
Coefficient of nonlinearity of a phase: 1.042642e-001
First order smothness: 5.418994e-001
Second order smothness: 8.212291e-001
------------------------------------------------------------
This track looks like CDDA with probability 54%."


So, while in Daffy's test tracks 3 and 4 source could not be qualified, in mine, yes, and it's a mixed result with regards to probability.

I hope someone knowledge on all this can help us sort it all out.