Forums > Queen - General Discussion > God saved the Queen: Band releases first album minus the iconic Mercury

forum rss feed
Author

mickyparise user not visiting Queenzone.com
mickyparise
Bohemian: 787 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 27 Oct 08, 12:07 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

By Jeff Miers / NEWS POP MUSIC CRITIC

Roger Taylor is the purveyor of massive and beautiful beats. Brian May is a genuine guitar hero whose orchestrated guitar harmonies gave Queen much of its regal air. Paul Rodgers brings his reputation as one of the finest rock singers to the fold

Like so many significant stories in the world of post-’60s rock, this one begins with the Beatles. More specifically, it begins with the 1968 double-album released simply as “The Beatles,” but known as “The White Album.” Across the span of two vinyl discs, the Fab Four delved into nearly every musical style imaginable, from the old-school rock ’n’ roll of “Back in the USSR” to the proto-heavy metal squall of “Helter Skelter;” the folksy country stroll of “Rocky Raccoon” to the trippy psychedelia of “Dear Prudence;” and from the pure music hall charm of “Martha My Dear” to the avant-garde soul of “Why Don’t We Do It in the Road?”

Already the most successful band in the world, the Beatles employed that fame as a license to split into four separate bands with four separate songwriters, and further, to fully indulge every whim of personal taste. In the process, the band created — wittingly or otherwise –what would come to be known as progressive rock.

Though it was forged in the fiery furnace of David Bowie’s gender-bending glam-rock, British quartet Queen built its career on –and employed as bedrock for its musical philosophy –the sprawling “White Album.”

It would add to the multi-idiomatic melange the Beatles presented with their masterpiece, bringing in an estimable amount of camp, show-tune grandiosity, the Sturm und Drang of opera, and ultimately, the anthemic qualities of arena-sized “big rock.” Along the way, the group would sell in excess of 150 million albums worldwide, making it one of the most successful bands in history.

Indelibly ambitious, deeply musical and fearlessly flamboyant, Queen meant many things to many people.

Singer, pianist, songwriter and one-of-a-kind frontman Freddie Mercury possessed an operatic tenor and an uncanny ability to carry off hard rock histrionics, white man’s soul, and fey Tin Pan Alley pop craftsmanship with equal aplomb and readily apparent conviction.

In Brian May, Queen boasted a genuine guitar hero, a musician whose larger-than-life solos and keen ear for orchestrated guitar harmonies gave the band much of its regal air and musical street-cred.

Drummer Roger Taylor sang like Rod Stewart and played like Led Zeppelin’s John Bonham. Bassist John Deacon was the quiet one, but his melodic lines and deep, guttural thump anchored the group, and he would prove to be perhaps the most pop-savvy of the Queen composers.

All four of them could write, all four of them were virtuosos, and most significantly, all four of them could sing. The ability to move with ease between musical styles became a Queen trademark, but it was the massive, neooperatic layering of the band’s harmony vocals that made it wholly unique within the rock landscape of the ’70s. This recipe informed all of the band’s hits, whether the song in question be the iconic mini-opera “Bohemian Rhapsody,” the arena-sized (English) football chant heroics of “We Will Rock You/We Are the Champions,” or the shameless disco-funk appropriation “Another One Bites the Dust.”

When, in 1991, Freddie Mercury succumbed to a lengthy battle with AIDS-related illnesses at the age of 45, Queen died along with him. The eccentric Mercury was not just another singer, and thus, was not replaceable. The surving members called it a day, after releasing one posthumous Mercury-based album, 1995’s “Made in Heaven.” That seemed to be that.

May, Taylor and Deacon kept a low profile, while the band’s enduring influence became readily apparent in the work of a new generation of bands, and its catalog continued to sell to a generation of listeners not even born when Queen scored most of its biggest hits.

In 2004, however, May and Taylor –Deacon was firm in his commitment to retirement – played a one-off gig at an English industry awards show with former Free/Bad Company/ the Firm singer Paul Rodgers. The magic, it seemed, had not wholly abandoned them. Soon enough, the trio –with the help of a few backing musicians –had rehearsed a program of Queen songs, peppered with a few of the various hits Rodgers had accrued over the years. (Between his efforts with the various bands he fronted, Rodgers has accrued nearly 150 million worldwide album sales himself.)

“Paul is not really replacing Freddie, because no man can,” Taylor said to The Buffalo News prior to a Queen + Paul Rodgers Buffalo tour stop in 2006. “He is completely his own man, and he brings a sound, style and approach that is wholly his own to the table. That’s why we can feel good about carrying on –it doesn’t at all feel like we’ve replaced Freddie. It’s more like we’ve formed a new band to play this repertoire of music that, I must say, still retains an awful lot of power.”

At the time of the Buffalo concert, Taylor was noncommittal about writing and recording plans for this new band. “We’re committed to this tour, but we have no plans beyond that,” the drummer said.

Now, however, the first album of new Queen material to be released sans the towering vocals and considerable songwriting acumen of Mercury is poised to hit the streets. Concurrently, the influence of Queen’s large-screen, grandiose vision of rock music is more pervasive than ever. It’s both interesting and ironic that Queen, the very band so many among the first generation of British punk rockers claimed to be rebelling against as bloated and irrelevant, has in fact had a broader influence than most of those angry young neo-anarchists. “God save the Queen,” indeed.

http://www.buffalonews.com/entertainment/story/474614.html


R.I.P. PRINCESS

Living Life on Life's Terms
Marcos Napier user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 622 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 27 Oct 08, 14:39 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

And the verdict is?
Too much talk (half of it is about Beatles), no sense at all. If this was a good review (for the PR fans), it's as full as BS as the others.


The Real Wizard user not visiting Queenzone.com
The Real Wizard
Deity: 18638 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 27 Oct 08, 15:29 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

News flash: The world doesn't revolve around Queen, and this reviewer acknowledges it.  The Beatles paved the way for bands like Queen, so when giving an account of their history, mentioning The Beatles in detail is quite just.  And to mention that Rodgers has sold about as many records as Queen is an important fact that most people don't know.  It is an excellent article... one of the best I've read on the subject.

And I love the dig at the Sex Pistols at the end.




"The more generous you are with your music, the more it comes back to you." -- Dan Lampinski



http://www.queenlive.ca
joe90 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Champion: 54 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 28 Oct 08, 03:54 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

I'm sure John would be chuffed to hear "more significantly all 4 of them could sing".

Major Tom user not visiting Queenzone.com
S.D.M.F
Major Tom
Bohemian: 878 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 28 Oct 08, 05:48 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote



joe90 wrote:

I'm sure John would be chuffed to hear "more significantly all 4 of them could sing".






It´s better to burn out than to fade away.
tjbarrett96 user not visiting Queenzone.com
All dead, all dead...
tjbarrett96
Bohemian: 161 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 28 Oct 08, 19:54 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Hehe...this article is from where I live! Never expected it to make Brian's website, though. I think this article is a bit neutral - doesn't really give the reader an idea about what to expect on the new album.


I have to return some videotapes.
The Real Wizard user not visiting Queenzone.com
The Real Wizard
Deity: 18638 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 28 Oct 08, 23:52 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote



tjbarrett96 wrote:

Hehe...this article is from where I live! Never expected it to make Brian's website, though. I think this article is a bit neutral - doesn't really give the reader an idea about what to expect on the new album.

Bear in mind it was written in the US, where most people haven't heard the record, as it was just released there today!




"The more generous you are with your music, the more it comes back to you." -- Dan Lampinski



http://www.queenlive.ca
Knute user not visiting Queenzone.com
Knute
Bohemian: 807 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 29 Oct 08, 08:47 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Well at least it doesn't start off with something like:
"Rodgers is far too hetrosexual to fill the sparkly flamboyant slippers of Freddie Mercury."

For that alone I give it credit.