Paul Rodgers wrong singer for queen.

Go to page:1 2 3

Author
Piett Champion: 58 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 16:08 paul rodgers is the wrong singer for queen.he can't sing queen songs well,and is no good entertainer for queen.he turned queen into a paul rodgers band.time for queen to find a new singer.
david (galashiels) the cosmos rocks. Royalty: 1395 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 16:27 here we go again........... i liked him,i enjoyed the concerts.. and it was.QUEEN+PAUL RODGERS. the boy done well in my opinion. the cosmos rocks
Holly2003 Hot Buttered Soul Deity: 2356 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 16:28 Well since he sells more albums that what's left of Queen, I think that's only fair. They really should have billed themselves PAUL RODGERS + Queen Reporter: "Is it true that the Sex Pistols make music for the man on the Street?" Sid Vicious: "I've met the man on the street and he's a c**t!"
Piett Champion: 58 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 16:37 I never liked it that they played so many paul rodger solo songs too.That just does not fit,the paul rodgers solo songs.Boring paul rodger songs anyway.
mooghead http://realitydysfunction.blog Bohemian: 770 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 17:39 I remember this conversation from 5..6..7.. years ago! Well done! http://realitydysfunction.blogspot.com/
Jam Monkey Bohemian: 372 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 17:42 Personally I loved the 3 shows I went to, and there were many more Queen songs played that Paul Rodgers songs. It's true that Paul's voice suited some songs more than others, but what did you expect? I much prefer QPR to no Queen at all, and I really hope they do some more shows in the future. I'm sorry to break it to you but Freddie Mercury is dead, now get over it. This forum gets far too many posts on this topic. I don't know why we can't get in to some decent discussions about Queen, sadly interesting threads on few and far between on QZ. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06l2ox61PPw
mooghead http://realitydysfunction.blog Bohemian: 770 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 17:46 Jam Monkey wrote: I don't know why we can't get in to some decent discussions about Queen, sadly interesting threads on few and far between on QZ. Maybe because Queen ceased to exist nearly 15 years ago.... how many decent topics do you expect??? http://realitydysfunction.blogspot.com/
Piett Champion: 58 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 17:53 I'm just saying there are much better voices out there that would fit better in queen live.
Mr Mercury Lover Of Women Singer Of Songs Deity: 4147 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 18:11 mooghead wrote: I remember this conversation from 5..6..7.. years ago! Well done! Personally I thought I was back in 2004............ glad to see the timewarp hasnt affected me........ "What do you do for a living Tommy?" "Ive been out of work for 3 years, Jim" "Oh smashing, Tommy!!" classic gaffe by Jim Bowen on Bullseye
brENsKi Deity: 4258 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 18:21 Piett wrote: I'm just saying there are much better voices out there that would fit better in queen live. yes. and they'd ALL want to bring their own solo songs to the tour....so the better the voice, the more of their own songs you would hear.....thereby negating the point of it being Queen+ in the first place - Seizure Moment: the shit in all of our ears ([c] Brenski) - i'm drowning here, and you're describing the water -(JN - AGAIG 1997) - a turd in a ribbon, still stinks of shit - ([c] Brenski)
Piett Champion: 58 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 18:40 There are for sure singers that like queen songs,and only wanne sing queen songs,or first make a few new songs with them.

theCro Royalty: 1032 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 20:59 Piett wrote: From the first moment alot of people agreed with the fact that paul rodgers was the wrong singer for queen.I certainly agree too.He turned queen into paul rodgers band,with paul rodgers songs. get a f* life and don't put your own opinion into "ALOF OF PEOPLE" * cu**
Piett Champion: 58 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 23:00
Piett Champion: 58 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 23:02 theCro wrote: Piett wrote: From the first moment alot of people agreed with the fact that paul rodgers was the wrong singer for queen.I certainly agree too.He turned queen into paul rodgers band,with paul rodgers songs. get a f* life and don't put your own opinion into "ALOF OF PEOPLE" * cu** you are definatly a paul rodgers solo fan.
Crazy LittleThing Royalty: 1481 posts	Posted: 14 Mar 10, 23:48 Piett wrote: From the first moment alot of people agreed with the fact that paul rodgers was the wrong singer for queen.I certainly agree too.He turned queen into paul rodgers band,with paul rodgers songs. Alert Brian and Roger immediately before they do something rash, such as going out on a couple of international tours with him! Whew! Crisis averted! I saved Spike's life in 'Nam.
Piett Champion: 58 posts	Posted: 15 Mar 10, 00:38 Crazy LittleThing wrote: Piett wrote: From the first moment alot of people agreed with the fact that paul rodgers was the wrong singer for queen.I certainly agree too.He turned queen into paul rodgers band,with paul rodgers songs. Alert Brian and Roger immediately before they do something rash, such as going out on a couple of international tours with him! Whew! Crisis averted! good idea.I'll go to court right away,to let paul rodgers stay solo.
Zebonka12 Deity: 10277 posts	Posted: 15 Mar 10, 02:12 He's not the wrong singer - his head is just in the wrong place most of the time. It only really worked when he was giving it 150%. Some great moments, but most of the time he was just lame. He sounded bored, and it made me just wish Brian would hop back on the mic. At least he sounds like he's trying. The cosmos ... and parts beyond http://www.angelfire.com/creep/clan_mccoolness/news.htm
Pim Derks Deity: 3762 posts	Posted: 15 Mar 10, 02:46 Paul Rodgers belting out Fat Bottomed Girls with only 50% of his capacity is still 100 times as good as Brian's version from the 1998 tour. Don't get me wrong, I love Brian and Roger - but Paul is just the better singer, even though there maybe were indeed some point of him cruise controlling.
pittrek Deity: 5812 posts	Posted: 15 Mar 10, 03:24 david (galashiels) wrote: here we go again........... i liked him,i enjoyed the concerts.. and it was.QUEEN+PAUL RODGERS. the boy done well in my opinion. Amen, brother. http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=1109319
Band Forever Champion: 81 posts	Posted: 15 Mar 10, 03:25 Paul Rodgers lacks the Power, and vocal range to emulate Freddie. Perhaps his 50% so called effort is a concession that even if he gave the Queen songs the full gun he still wouldn't nail half the songs, therefore saving his voice for his own tours! Sorry Paul Rodgers fans you cannot hide from the truth, he tried he just aint got it.

Go to page:1 2 3