| Author |
|
Piett
Champion: 58 posts
|
paul rodgers is the wrong singer for queen.he can't sing queen songs well,and is no good entertainer for queen.he turned queen into a paul rodgers band.time for queen to find a new singer.
|
david (galashiels)
Deity: 2027 posts
|
here we go again........... i liked him,i enjoyed the concerts.. and it was.QUEEN+PAUL RODGERS. the boy done well in my opinion.
|
Holly2003
Hot Buttered Soul
Deity: 4760 posts
|
Well since he sells more albums that what's left of Queen, I think that's only fair. They really should have billed themselves PAUL RODGERS + Queen
"With a population of 1.75 million, Northern Ireland should really be a footballing minnow. Instead, they could be better described as the piranhas of the international game" (FIFA.com)
|
Piett
Champion: 58 posts
|
I never liked it that they played so many paul rodger solo songs too.That just does not fit,the paul rodgers solo songs.Boring paul rodger songs anyway.
|
mooghead
Deity: 3776 posts
|
I remember this conversation from 5..6..7.. years ago! Well done!
|
Jam Monkey
Bohemian: 664 posts
|
Personally I loved the 3 shows I went to, and there were many more Queen songs played that Paul Rodgers songs. It's true that Paul's voice suited some songs more than others, but what did you expect? I much prefer QPR to no Queen at all, and I really hope they do some more shows in the future. I'm sorry to break it to you but Freddie Mercury is dead, now get over it. This forum gets far too many posts on this topic. I don't know why we can't get in to some decent discussions about Queen, sadly interesting threads on few and far between on QZ.
Contact me, I'm no Darth Vader: jam_monkey@hotmail.com
|
mooghead
Deity: 3776 posts
|
Jam Monkey wrote:
I don't know why we can't get in to some decent discussions about Queen, sadly interesting threads on few and far between on QZ. Maybe because Queen ceased to exist nearly 15 years ago.... how many decent topics do you expect???
|
Piett
Champion: 58 posts
|
I'm just saying there are much better voices out there that would fit better in queen live.
|
Mr Mercury
Adam who?????
Deity: 4658 posts
|
mooghead wrote:
I remember this conversation from 5..6..7.. years ago! Well done! Personally I thought I was back in 2004............ glad to see the timewarp hasnt affected me........
"Normally i can't dance to save my life.
But as soon as I step in dog shit, I can moonwalk better than Michael Jackson."
|
brENsKi
How shall we f**k off, Oh Lord
Deity: 8088 posts
|
Piett wrote:
I'm just saying there are much better voices out there that would fit better in queen live.
yes. and they'd ALL want to bring their own solo songs to the tour....so the better the voice, the more of their own songs you would hear.....thereby negating the point of it being Queen+ in the first place
go deo na hÉireann
|
Piett
Champion: 58 posts
|
There are for sure singers that like queen songs,and only wanne sing queen songs,or first make a few new songs with them.
|
|
theCro
Royalty: 1056 posts
|
Piett wrote:
From the first moment alot of people agreed with the fact that paul rodgers was the wrong singer for queen.I certainly agree too.He turned queen into paul rodgers band,with paul rodgers songs.
get a f*** life and don't put your own opinion into "ALOF OF PEOPLE" *** cu**
|
Piett
Champion: 58 posts
|
|
Piett
Champion: 58 posts
|
theCro wrote:
Piett wrote:
From the first moment alot of people agreed with the fact that paul rodgers was the wrong singer for queen.I certainly agree too.He turned queen into paul rodgers band,with paul rodgers songs.
get a f*** life and don't put your own opinion into "ALOF OF PEOPLE" *** cu** you are definatly a paul rodgers solo fan.
|
Crazy LittleThing
Royalty: 1593 posts
|
Piett wrote:
From the first moment alot of people agreed with the fact that paul rodgers was the wrong singer for queen.I certainly agree too.He turned queen into paul rodgers band,with paul rodgers songs.
Alert Brian and Roger immediately before they do something rash, such as going out on a couple of international tours with him! Whew! Crisis averted!
I saved Spike's life in 'Nam.
|
Piett
Champion: 58 posts
|
Crazy LittleThing wrote:
Piett wrote:
From the first moment alot of people agreed with the fact that paul rodgers was the wrong singer for queen.I certainly agree too.He turned queen into paul rodgers band,with paul rodgers songs.
Alert Brian and Roger immediately before they do something rash, such as going out on a couple of international tours with him! Whew! Crisis averted! good idea.I'll go to court right away,to let paul rodgers stay solo.
|
john bodega
Deity: 12721 posts
|
He's not the wrong singer - his head is just in the wrong place most of the time. It only really worked when he was giving it 150%. Some great moments, but most of the time he was just lame. He sounded bored, and it made me just wish Brian would hop back on the mic. At least he sounds like he's trying.
|
Pim Derks
Deity: 4310 posts
|
Paul Rodgers belting out Fat Bottomed Girls with only 50% of his capacity is still 100 times as good as Brian's version from the 1998 tour. Don't get me wrong, I love Brian and Roger - but Paul is just the better singer, even though there maybe were indeed some point of him cruise controlling.
|
pittrek
Deity: 10160 posts
|
david (galashiels) wrote:
here we go again...........
i liked him,i enjoyed the concerts..
and it was.QUEEN+PAUL RODGERS.
the boy done well in my opinion. Amen, brother.
|
Band Forever
Bohemian: 212 posts
|
Paul Rodgers lacks the Power, and vocal range to emulate Freddie.
Perhaps his 50% so called effort is a concession that even if he gave the Queen songs the full gun he still wouldn't nail half the songs, therefore saving his voice for his own tours!
Sorry Paul Rodgers fans you cannot hide from the truth, he tried he just aint got it.
|
