Forums > Queen + Adam Lambert > Call Me

forum rss feed
Author

Gretsch6120 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Rocker: 29 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 Feb 11, 14:26 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Just read on the official website that 'Call Me' was originally marked down to be the follow-up single to 'C-Lebrity'. Do you think it would have made any difference if it had been released as a single? I think it would have been interesting to see it played live.


rockitnroll.wordpress.com twitter.com/rockitnroll
FriedChicken user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 10641 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 04 Mar 11, 02:40 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

It wouldn't have made a difference, considering the promotion Queen did... How can anyone buy the album or singles when no one knows there is one!


"On the first day Pim & Niek created a heavenly occupation. Pim & Niek blessed it and named it 'Loosch'."



(Genesis 1:1)
queenside user not visiting Queenzone.com
taking my ride with destiny
queenside
Bohemian: 608 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 04 Mar 11, 15:54 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

i read on wikipedia that cosmos rocks is platinum in uk. surely that can't be. i know wikipedia isn't very relieble.


I watched as fear took the old men's gaze

Hopes of the young in troubled graves

I see no day, I heard him say

So grey is the face of every mortal

FriedChicken user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 10641 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 Mar 11, 05:28 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

That just not true, it has been researched, and it turned out that Wikipedia has less errors than the big encyclopediae.


"On the first day Pim & Niek created a heavenly occupation. Pim & Niek blessed it and named it 'Loosch'."



(Genesis 1:1)
catqueen user not visiting Queenzone.com
:)

Royalty: 1758 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 28 Jun 11, 10:22 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

FriedChicken wrote: That just not true, it has been researched, and it turned out that Wikipedia has less errors than the big encyclopediae.

Please say u didnt get that research off wikipedia tho :P  hehe