Forums > Queen + Adam Lambert > Why is Q+AL more successful than Q+PR?

forum rss feed
Author

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 2088 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 02 Feb 19, 09:47 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Circle of Eidolon wrote:

PrimeJiveUSA wrote:

@The Circle of Eidolon

Why do you think runner 70 is "powerless".


Powerless because despite his insults no one has run away

Despite his condemnation of those who do not agree with him, they have stood fast

As often as he puts down the musicians in the band they continue to play, and play what they wish to play.

Audience's buy tickets, he's attempts on here and elsewhere to belittle them has obviously failed, as has he.

He is powerless in all that he posts, his thoughts are as deep as coffee spilled in saucer, and if he wasn't as foolishly offensive as he appears to be, most of what he says is laughable

These are the answers to your question

The Circle of Eidolon has spoken

And you are an idiot copying a troll on here - Asswhipe


Michael Allred user not visiting Queenzone.com

Royalty: 1780 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 02 Feb 19, 11:48 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Q+AL has been more successful than Q+PR because;
1) Adam is younger with a younger fanbase who in turn promote the shit out of it on social media plus mainstream media likely find a good looking and talented singer to be an easy sell
2) Adam has, in America at least, has had a far more successful career here as opposed to Rodgers whose solo success pales in comparison add to which Rodgers has nowhere the same name recognition on his own as opposed to the bands he was in
3) Q+AL also have performed on US TV and capitalized on that coverage whereas Q+PR as best as I can recall, never did. The closest Q+PR came to that was Queen week on American Idol and even then Rodgers was barely mentioned.
There are more reasons but i think you get the gist