Forums > Personal > Where's the cocksucking thread?

forum rss feed
Author

Penis - Vagina user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 4230 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 27 Jun 04, 23:02 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

I thought there was no censorship here. Absolute freedom of speech. So it's okay to make vulgar use of a religious figure which offends the majority of the population but an entire thread about cocksucking does get removed?

I pointed out a profile pic which was illegal in most countries, but you don't get rid of someone's profile by removing a thread, so what's the deal?

Panchgani user not visiting Queenzone.com
St Peter's Burnt Piano
Panchgani
Deity: 6372 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 27 Jun 04, 23:20 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Interesting ... but this is Richard's turf and he can do what he wants.

Maybe the topic title was perceived to be anti-gay and offensive?


Roger: I like it. If you don't. Sod you!



Queen song poll: http://home.comcast.net/~vantricers/index.html



B-52's: I, I, I'm lookin for some fun - waitin for the REAL Queen Box Sets to come
Panchgani user not visiting Queenzone.com
St Peter's Burnt Piano
Panchgani
Deity: 6372 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 27 Jun 04, 23:22 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

certainly there has been pornography in profile pics ... but never oral gratification.


Roger: I like it. If you don't. Sod you!



Queen song poll: http://home.comcast.net/~vantricers/index.html



B-52's: I, I, I'm lookin for some fun - waitin for the REAL Queen Box Sets to come
Penis - Vagina user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 4230 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 28 Jun 04, 00:03 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Anti-gay and offensive? I support such topics 100% as long as there are other offensive topics. Everyone should be offended equally.

I suppose a topic about ejaculating in Richard Orchard's anus would probably be removed too.. after all, he's more important and has more followers than Jesus, right?

I'm only pointing out the hypocrisy here. Charles should have been banned ages ago. Let him have his free speech the first 100 times, fine. Is it censorship to get rid of someone who is saying the same bullshit over and over, and then escalating into personal attacks, then blatantly offending Christians?

Penis - Vagina user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 4230 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 28 Jun 04, 02:08 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Nevermind about my original topic anyway.. they probably deleted that person's account which took their thread with it. I apologize for jumping to conclusions.