Forums > Queen - Serious Discussion > Printing errors on original Queen II

forum rss feed
Author

goinback user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 997 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 Aug 04, 17:27 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

I've read Queen II wasn't released as soon as it was supposed to be due to a minor printing error on the cover that the band insisted be corrected...anyone know what it was?


"I have no time for Time magazine. Or Rolling Stone." Jethro Tull
The Real Wizard user not visiting Queenzone.com
The Real Wizard
Deity: 18638 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 Aug 04, 21:54 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

goinback wrote:

I've read Queen II wasn't released as soon as it was supposed to be due to a minor printing error on the cover that the band insisted be corrected...anyone know what it was?


It'd be really interesting to know, but unfortunately, I don't think we'll ever know. That's why they got it fixed! :P


"The more generous you are with your music, the more it comes back to you." -- Dan Lampinski



http://www.queenlive.ca
Panchgani user not visiting Queenzone.com
St Peter's Burnt Piano
Panchgani
Deity: 6374 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 Aug 04, 22:06 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

I thought it was John putting his foot down and insisting that his name be shown as John Deacon rather than Deacon John.

Unless my mind is playing tricks on me, I believe this is fairly well documented, but I am too lazy to look it up.


Roger: I like it. If you don't. Sod you!



Queen song poll: http://home.comcast.net/~vantricers/index.html



B-52's: I, I, I'm lookin for some fun - waitin for the REAL Queen Box Sets to come