Forums > Personal > Band Wars 3..... The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones

forum rss feed
Author

Scott_Mercury user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 704 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 17:42 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Which band is better??

Why??


Having a smoking area in a restaurant is like having a pissing section in a swimming pool
brENsKi user not visiting Queenzone.com
How shall we f**k off, Oh Lord
brENsKi
Deity: 8088 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 17:52 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

this is a f***ing no brainer - only one winner
The Beatles
how can you even put the stones and beatles head to head? at least make a fair fight


go deo na h√Čireann
Mercuryworks user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 757 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 17:59 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

John Lennon always said if the Beatles never came The Stones would be the best

Stones are good but no Beatles

Why look at the amount of fans, sales, even paul solo is better than the stones this is not an opinion but fact this is coming from a HUGE Beatles Fan and A Huge Stones Fan


<blank>
XcessQueen user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 381 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 18:00 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Beatles!

...because they have 2 or 3 good songs... and Rolling Stones have none!!! :)))

Mercuryworks user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 757 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 18:02 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

XcessQueen wrote:

Beatles!

...because they have 2 or 3 good songs... and Rolling Stones have none!!! :)))


Rolling Stones have lots of hits and EVERY BEATLES SONG was a HIT


<blank>
Scott_Mercury user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 704 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 18:15 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Brenski..

I totally agree... I think the Beatles are beyond the Rolling stones league...

However... as sure as Freddie and Liberace are sitting at a Rhinestone piano together right now... someone will post on here that the Beatles are overated.

Or my favorite...which is real original
"Duh, da Beatles are 4 ugly dudes with 4 good songs"

Whatever,
The Beatles kick total ass.




Having a smoking area in a restaurant is like having a pissing section in a swimming pool
hoop-didi-didi user not visiting Queenzone.com

Champion: 65 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 19:21 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Beatles hands down! :)



Down in the city just hoople and me.....
Bob The Shrek user not visiting Queenzone.com
Bob The Shrek
Deity: 4014 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 20:30 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Beatles record speaks for itself but I prefer listening to the Stones.


Cleveland May 24 to June 4th 2007 - I came, I saw, I fucked off home again.
Panchgani user not visiting Queenzone.com
St Peter's Burnt Piano
Panchgani
Deity: 6374 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 20:43 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Rolling Stones: the world's most over-rated band.

Sure, the stones had a few good songs, but they could not carry The Beatles jock strap.

The Beatles - absolutely no question.


Roger: I like it. If you don't. Sod you!



Queen song poll: http://home.comcast.net/~vantricers/index.html



B-52's: I, I, I'm lookin for some fun - waitin for the REAL Queen Box Sets to come
Grantcdn user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 200 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 22:30 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

yes Obviously the Beatles here....Stones had a few good songs in the 40 or so years they have been around but not much talent on the hole....The Beatles on the other hand were incredibly creative and wrote lots of great songs in a much shorter timespan....

Beatles by a landslide.......stones are so over-rated...maybe just because drugs were so popular at that time...

wstüssyb user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 12371 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 22:55 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Beatles, They came at the right time, simple words and simple music that no one has yet to par up with


MY GOD spell it write.
Tero user not visiting Queenzone.com

Royalty: 1012 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 08 May 05, 23:11 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Beatles are overrated. ;)

I do appreciate the fact they have good songs, but saying every single one of them is a hit is just daft. :P

Gunpowder Gelatine user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 2541 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 May 05, 02:01 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Beatles. I like The Rolling Stones but The Beatles, whether you like them or not, were revolutionary and changed music.


Resistance is futile. You are now an orb.

Serry... user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 8271 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 May 05, 03:02 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Beatles without any doubts...

Would you make topic: Band Wars X..... Queen vs The Cross? :)

iGSM user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 5001 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 May 05, 03:02 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Well at least 27 of them are hits. Fuck you, Humperdinck! *goes to Strawberry Fields*

The Beatles. I can't really say I know of many Stones songs..Only Rock 'n' Roll, Paint It Black..er..Frenchy French Frenches? Oh, that Satisfaction one too. I don't really take any interest in them.

The love you take is equal to the love..*chords*..you make! *guitar solo*


...this kettle is boiling over...

...one dump...one turd...two tits...John Deacon...

...one prawn...one shrimp...one clam...one chicken!
mr bad guy 5656 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 143 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 May 05, 03:57 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

hard one...

But the beatles are the winner.
:)


Smoggy user not visiting Queenzone.com

Rocker: 20 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 May 05, 10:00 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Beatles. No shadow of a doubt - they are the greatest band of all-time. No band before or since can touch them when it comes to output and the ability to write prolifically (sp) great material. They never made a bad album

Mexcal user not visiting Queenzone.com

Champion: 54 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 May 05, 10:14 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

please don't say beatles by a landslide or things like that, you got to listen the stones's records between 1968/1972, and then you can talk

Tero user not visiting Queenzone.com

Royalty: 1012 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 May 05, 10:33 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Looking at the tracklists on the Beatles albums, it seems that they have a lot more lousy songs than the likes of Queen.

Besides the hits available on 1962-1966, the first seven albums includes loads of totally unmemorable tracks as well as numerous cover songs...
The latter half of the catalogue (that is not featured on the 1967-1970 compilation) consists of artsy fartsy pretentious crap culminating in the likes of "Revolution 9".

Sadly the world is as objective about The Beatles' merits, as a Queen convention is when it comes to Roger's first solo album. :P

Mr.Jingles user not visiting Queenzone.com
Mr.Jingles
Deity: 10532 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 May 05, 10:56 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

The Beatles definitely by a LANDSLIDE!!

Sure thing, The Stones had their share of hits but they're still miles away from having so much musical essence like The Beatles did. It doesn't matter what era or what albums are we talking about.


[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Brandon wrote: [/QUOTENAME]... and now the "best you can offer is Mr. Jingles? HA! He's... just pathetic.[/QUOTE]