Forums > Queen - General Discussion > queen album reviews

forum rss feed
Author

not that bad user not visiting Queenzone.com

Champion: 53 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 Jan 06, 16:20 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/69088/reviews

Rompez user is on Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 222 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 Jan 06, 16:32 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Anybody wants to read this pathetic "reviews"?

Fraz user not visiting Queenzone.com

Royalty: 1129 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Rompez user is on Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 222 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 Jan 06, 16:59 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

It seems to me that this texts were written more to insult Queen members rather than to review their albums. Crap RS.

not that bad user not visiting Queenzone.com

Champion: 53 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 09 Jan 06, 17:53 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

look at jazz

jasen101 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 746 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 08:26 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

absolutely laughable...it's almost like the critics were jealous or something. RS definately had an anti-queen agenda and probably still do...fuck em...i dont buy their crap mag anyway. It's full of pro-trendy jizz and commercials.


Freddie: "Yes, we'll have a great big cock fly over the crowd!"

Roadies: "Yeah! Great Idea!"

Freddie: "And it will fly into a great big mouth with a moustache!"

Munchsack user not visiting Queenzone.com

Royalty: 1770 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 08:26 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote


Nice signature, jasen101.

And does A Night At The Opera no longer EXIST or something?


This can't end well.
Stryder user not visiting Queenzone.com

Champion: 58 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 08:50 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

that CHUCK EDDY should be bitchslapped!!

zaiga user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 385 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 09:33 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

It's good for a laugh. They are even mildly positive about Queen I and The Works... sort of.


Flick of the wrist
Oszmercury user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 229 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 10:20 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

they used to do somethin similar with Zeppelin in the 70's, now you can check the reviews and all have change, i hate when RS write somethin about Queen, it's full of ignorance and talk about everythin but the music


Loser in the end!!!
Jazz 78 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 502 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 10:28 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Rolling Stone ALWAYS bagged Queen right from the start. They did a shitty piece in 1981 when the band went to South America. Roger was so pissed off he wrote them a letter in protest on an air sickness bag... which they printed. Never pay attention to the reviews. Critics get their albums for free. WE are the ones that count because we buy them.

masterstroke_84 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 542 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 10:28 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

PLASE READ THE JAZZ REVIEW... THAT GUY HAVE PROBLEMS WITH QUEEN OR SOMETHING... YOU CAN´T WRITE THAT STUFF... READ IT.

Cheers.

P.


Queen rocks!
Queenman!! user not visiting Queenzone.com
Queenman!!
Bohemian: 931 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 11:36 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Always Rolling Stone are talking Shit about Queen.
I'm curious how the Rolling Stones are judged.

Everything 5 stars *****. LOL!

Stupid magazine!


You made us laugh, you made us cry, you made us feel like we could fly!
Queenman!! user not visiting Queenzone.com
Queenman!!
Bohemian: 931 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 11:39 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Innuendo en Hot Space the same Stars???!! LOL

Who are those music critics? Probably drunk or Stone(d)


You made us laugh, you made us cry, you made us feel like we could fly!
NJQueenFan user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 187 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 13:11 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

OMG, that review of Jazz is just ridiculous! It doesn't even make sense!


"So you think you can stone me and spit in my eye? So you think you can love me and leave me to die?"



-Bohemian Rhapsody
Asterik user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 649 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 10 Jan 06, 16:20 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

With each review only a couple of the songs ar ementioned. I sense the reviewers HAVEN'T EVEN BOTHERED TO LISTEN TO IT, prefering to make left-wing claptrap comments on them being royal and imperialist. They clearly haven't judged the music, as is shown by their appalling review of a very good Queen labum, "Jazz". But notice how begrudgingly, their attitude softens over time- to the point where on Innuendo they do give qualified praise. It's only now that these pompous,arty magazines are beginning to realise how good the band were. I am a big fan of U2 but I know that they could release an album of nursey rhymes and RS would give it at least 4 stars probably because it was "a clever social comment."


hj
DrCari user not visiting Queenzone.com

Rocker: 48 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 11 Jan 06, 01:16 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

I am an older Queen fan and I remember very well that Queen was routinely dissed and essentially ignored by the American music reviewers in the late 70's through early 60's.

Personally, I think Queen's sound was ahead of the music trends at the time. There was a schism in rock between the movement toward disco and punk. Queen didn't fit either category and were simply dismissed by much of the music press. I would imagine some of those reviewers would like to forget having written those nasty reviews now.

Hooligan's Holiday user not visiting Queenzone.com
Hooligan's Holiday
Royalty: 1002 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 12 Jan 06, 20:57 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

None of em got more than 3 stars!!! And where's ANATO?


We are, we are the saints

We signed our life away

Doesn't matter what you think

We're gonna do it anyway

We are, we are the saints

One day you will confess

And pray to the

Saints of Los Angeles
Hooligan's Holiday user not visiting Queenzone.com
Hooligan's Holiday
Royalty: 1002 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 12 Jan 06, 21:00 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

"There's no Jazz on Queen's new record, in case fans of either were worried about the defilement of an icon. Queen hasn't the imagination to play jazz—Queen hasn't the imagination, for that matter, to play rock & roll."

*gasp* THEY DO TOO GOTS TALENT!!! *sobs* Why must they be such fucking jerks?


We are, we are the saints

We signed our life away

Doesn't matter what you think

We're gonna do it anyway

We are, we are the saints

One day you will confess

And pray to the

Saints of Los Angeles
Hooligan's Holiday user not visiting Queenzone.com
Hooligan's Holiday
Royalty: 1002 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 12 Jan 06, 21:00 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

"There's no Jazz on Queen's new record, in case fans of either were worried about the defilement of an icon. Queen hasn't the imagination to play jazz—Queen hasn't the imagination, for that matter, to play rock & roll."

*gasp* THEY DO TOO GOTS TALENT!!! *sobs* Why must they be such fucking jerks?


We are, we are the saints

We signed our life away

Doesn't matter what you think

We're gonna do it anyway

We are, we are the saints

One day you will confess

And pray to the

Saints of Los Angeles