Forums > Queen - Serious Discussion > 2006 has been indeed a brilliant year for Queen research!

forum rss feed
Author

Sebastian user not visiting Queenzone.com
Sebastian
Deity: 6327 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 28 Jul 06, 14:39 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Hi everybody, I've just run briefly through some of the top Queen sites and I feel uplifted (and I haven't drunk in six weeks btw).

I think this has been a wonderful year so far: Queen Archives is impressive, Queen Autographs is excellent and Queen Cuttings is superb!

This might seem a naive idea but I actually believe the dedication and knowledge of those queen scholars have made it possible for us to enjoy a brand new generation of Queen sites (plus some perfect-becoming-more-perfect classics), and that's certainly outdone the mediocrity of QP and Mr Brooks.

My idea for this thread is for us to compile some "news" on Queen investigation (otherwise it'd merely be a personal-section post). Any help is welcomed.

Cheers all!


John hated HS. Fred's fave singer was not PR. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' Witness testimonies are often inaccurate. Scotland's not in England. 'Bo Rhap' hasn't got 180 voices.