Forums > Queen - General Discussion > Queen Vs. Queen+PR

forum rss feed
Author

masterstroke_84 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 542 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Dec 06, 16:36 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

a question for the people who have the honour to see both shows:

In terms of SOUND QUALITY, wich one was better?...

P.


Queen rocks!
mircal user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 555 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Dec 06, 17:14 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

its been say 20 years since Freddie played with queen.... Thats likes saying whats better, Super Mario Bros on the NES or now Mario 64, Galaxy or what ever.

Times have chnaged and Queen are not the band they once were. PLus the gigs now are smaller compared to there last tours with Fred. Im sure Queen would win no questions asked over Queen + RP.... But, i think with todays technology the sound would be better with Q+PR, cleaner, more chrisp sounds, even Rogers druming sounds sharper.

masterstroke_84 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 542 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Dec 06, 17:24 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

neeeeext...


Queen rocks!
thefairyfeller user not visiting Queenzone.com

Be Gentle, I'm a newbie: 12 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Dec 06, 18:28 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Solo vi a Q+PR

En terminos de sonido seguramente es superior hoy en día... pero no creo que los shows puedan compararse... muy distintos...!

Un abrazo guacho! jajaja

Tas desaparecido... o quizas yo! =P

Adiossssssssssssss

BRYCE THE TROLL user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 313 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Dec 06, 19:55 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

from a voice qualaty stand point Queen Tears Q+PR's SPINE OUT AND BEATS HIM WITH IT from an instrument stand point Q+PR but that's not fair becuse Q+PR also has a shitload of backup musicions wich only make them seem fake!

Goin Back user not visiting Queenzone.com

Be Gentle, I'm a newbie: 1 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Dec 06, 04:57 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

There isn't anything to say about it. Paul Rogers is a good singer, really, but he will never be as good as Freddie! There will never be a better singer than Freddie Mercury in this world.
This is my opinion. Queen was QUEEN, and they were the BEST!!!! Now it's Queen + Paul Rogers. It's okay, but it's not QUEEN.


Simone Wagner
Ayreon user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 139 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Dec 06, 06:33 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Goin Back wrote:

There isn't anything to say about it. Paul Rogers is a good singer, really, but he will never be as good as Freddie! There will never be a better singer than Freddie Mercury in this world.
This is my opinion. Queen was QUEEN, and they were the BEST!!!! Now it's Queen + Paul Rogers. It's okay, but it's not QUEEN.


Yeah Yeah, blah blah... Please READ the question. The question was about SOUND QuALITY; not which band is better...

Micrówave user not visiting Queenzone.com
Delilah, on Medium Power
Micrówave
Deity: 7037 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Dec 06, 13:17 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

So you're asking: Does digital recording sound better than analog recording?

Yes.

Bono Mercury user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 134 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Dec 06, 13:22 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

We had this topic over and over again will ye just give a rest please fuck sake


And All I Can Do Is Surrender.
PieterMC user not visiting Queenzone.com
PieterMC
Deity: 3931 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Dec 06, 13:41 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

BRYCE THE TROLL wrote:

Q+PR also has a shitload of backup musicions wich only make them seem fake!


Queen Live 1986:

Freddie
Brian
Roger
John
Spike

Q+PR Live 2006:

Brian
Roger
Spike
Paul
Jamie
Danny

Q+PR only have 1 extra person on stage.

Micrówave user not visiting Queenzone.com
Delilah, on Medium Power
Micrówave
Deity: 7037 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Dec 06, 13:44 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Yes, an extra guitarist. NOT an extra vocalist.

jeep49 user not visiting Queenzone.com


add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 22 Dec 06, 07:31 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

ahhhh but Jamie's also BV's

Drowse1 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 153 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 25 Dec 06, 12:03 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Who cares about comparing the sound quality? Queen + PR didn't work, will never work and should be laid to rest immediately!


I reign with my left hand, I rule with my right.
masterstroke_84 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 542 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 25 Dec 06, 12:46 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Yes they DID work... give proves about you are saying.. my proves are: almost 50 European/Japanese SOLD OUT shows and a complete USA tour with GREAT reviews... and now they are recording a studio album... all that in 2 years... that is to "not work"??

P.


Queen rocks!
masterstroke_84 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 542 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 25 Dec 06, 12:56 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

... and thousands and thousands of happy fans all around the world... what other prove do you need?... think about the fans... the younger ones... that didn´t have the chance to see them live... I dont understand people who think they have the right to tell Brian and Roger what to do with his career... let them be happy and the fans too...

P.


Queen rocks!
Serry... user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 8271 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 25 Dec 06, 13:02 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

To sell out two full Wembleys or hardly sold out 75% of 5 small halls with 7000 seats - are different cases...

I'd agree with opinion about extra musicians - that sucks! In Queen days Spike/Fred/Morgan appeared on stage to show themselves on 3 mins during CLTCL and even it was too much for them actually. Queen's greatest shows (which are their shows from the 70s) were played only by them...

masterstroke_84 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 542 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 25 Dec 06, 13:28 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

wrong...

spike and morgan use to make background sounds in the complete show and backing vocals (for ex. Spike clearly on "Tear it up"... keyboards on "magic".. "who wants to live forever"... "break free"... "impromptu"...."ga-ga"... etc...)

And about Jamie, Brian say that NOW, in these days... he prefers to have an extra guitarrist because he feels more free to improvise and not be forced to do rhythm fills, solos, arrengements, etc.

Spike and Morgan fisher or fred mandel interact with the band the whole show, but they´re only showed onstage in CLTCL..

P.


Queen rocks!
Serry... user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 8271 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 25 Dec 06, 13:39 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Thanks for the lesson of Queen's history!

"spike and morgan use to make background sounds in the complete show and backing vocals"

...and...

"Spike and Morgan fisher or fred mandel interact with the band the whole show, but they´re only showed onstage in CLTCL.."

This is what I wrote, didn't I? "In Queen days Spike/Fred/Morgan appeared on stage to show themselves on 3 mins during CLTCL and even it was too much for them actually." So why I'm wrong?

About Moses - I'm not discussing why Brian NOW needs in him, I'm saying that it sucks.

Nathan user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 2305 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 25 Dec 06, 14:19 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Can someone please explain to me why this whole Q+PR thing is so controversial? Why do so many people hate it?

I mean, look at Led Zeppelin (or should that be Jimmy Page, Robert Plant and John Paul Jones?). When they reunited at Live Aid with Phil Collins and that other guy (Terry Thompson?) on drums, or when they've reunited occasionally with Jason Bonham taking up his father's place at the drums no one's complained. As a matter of fact, nearly everyone's happy that they can see three members of one of the greatest bands of all time perform together. Mind you, this is only on REALLY special occasions.

Now let's look at Q+PR. A similar reformation of another of the world's finest rock bands BUT this reunion has tours and even a new album to look forward to and a lot of people on here and at QOL are up in arms about it. Everyone's entitled to their own opinions and I respect each and every one of your opinions as regarding the new tour.

But it's always really mystified me as to why Queen should receive such backlash for deciding to continue on and make music for the masses to enjoy with some fresh new material in there too.

Could anyone please help me solve this puzzle?

Sorry but I can't find a Q+PR bashing thread (shock shock horror horror) to post this in.

masterstroke_84 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 542 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 25 Dec 06, 15:15 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

exactly... seems like nothing in the world can make a Queen fan happy... :S

only Freddie resurrecting maybe...


if they didn´t make a tour: complain
if they made a tour: complain
if thet didn´t make a new album: complain
is they make a new new new album: complain
if they tour without Fred: complain

and on and on...

GOD BLESS QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS.


Queen rocks!